E. Venizelos'un Yunanistan'ın İngiltere'ye olan savaş borcuna ilişkin muhtırası.
173.047.27 · <1926 Δεκέμβριος> · Αγγλική · makine üretimi, denetlenmedi
Tarama
Özgün metin (diplomatik transkripsiyon)
OCR: kontrollerden geçti · evren/qwen3-vl-30b
supplies of Athens, the reclaiming of the marshy lands in Macedonia, the indispensable completion of our railways. A mere glance at these figures ought to be convincing as to the fact that if in the case of Italy it was considered that she could not be burdened with a bigger percentage for the repayment of her external debt, Greece should be considered as being already so heavily burdened that she is not in a position to carry further burdens for the repayment of her war debt and the whole of her war debt should be cancelled, as was done for Bulgaria and Turkey. But we would reach similar conclusions if we were to compare Greece, not with Italy but with Bulgaria whom it would be more appropriate and just to compare Greece to. Before the war Bulgaria disposed annually of 39,000,000 gold francs for the service of her external debt. and although she was obliged, in virtue of the Treaty of Neuilly, to pay 290,000,000 sterling on account of reparations the Allied Powers decided in 1923 to substantially curtail same as aforementioned (page 6). Considering on the other hand that for her pre-war debt Bulgaria obtained a reduction of the service whereof to 34% only of the sum paid before the war, Bulgaria in conclusion actually pays annually for her debt in gold 22,000,000 gold francs. Moreover the annual payment up to the year 1933 will not exceed 26,000,000 gold francs, and only as from 1933 onwards will the annual payment rise to 33,500,000 gold francs. When one compares this amount disposed of by Bulgaria for the service of her external debt, to the sum already provided by Greece and to what she will have to provide for on account of the new refugee loan and towards her proportionate share of the Public Ottoman Debt, one
Damgalar ve notlar
- stamp ΜΠΗ/Βενάκη bottom right
- archival 14 top center
- letterhead supplies of Athens, the reclaiming of the marshy lands in Macedonia, the indispensable completion of our railways. A mere glance at these figures ought to be convincing as to the fact that if in the case of Italy it was considered that she could not be burdened with a bigger percentage for the repayment of her external debt, Greece should be considered as being already so heavily burdened that she is not in a position to carry further burdens for the repayment of her war debt and the whole of her war debt should be cancelled, as was done for Bulgaria and Turkey. But we would reach similar conclusions if we were to compare Greece, not with Italy but with Bulgaria whom it would be more appropriate and just to compare Greece to. Before the war Bulgaria disposed annually of 39,000,000 gold francs for the service of her external debt. and although she was obliged, in virtue of the Treaty of Neuilly, to pay 290,000,000 sterling on account of reparations the Allied Powers decided in 1923 to substantially curtail same as aforementioned (page 6). Considering on the other hand that for her pre-war debt Bulgaria obtained a reduction of the service whereof to 34% only of the sum paid before the war, Bulgaria in conclusion actually pays annually for her debt in gold 22,000,000 gold francs. Moreover the annual payment up to the year 1933 will not exceed 26,000,000 gold francs, and only as from 1933 onwards will the annual payment rise to 33,500,000 gold francs. When one compares this amount disposed of by Bulgaria for the service of her external debt, to the sum already provided by Greece and to what she will have to provide for on account of the new refugee loan and towards her proportionate share of the Public Ottoman Debt, one top left
- handwritten_note 1926 Δεκέμβριος top right
Dimotiki Yunanca
Henüz yok.
Türkçe
temini, Makedonya'daki bataklık arazilerin ıslahı, demiryollarımızın zorunlu olarak tamamlanması. Bu rakamlara şöyle bir göz atmak bile şu hususta ikna edici olmalıdır: İtalya'ya dış borcunun geri ödenmesi için daha büyük bir yüzdenin yüklenemeyeceği kabul edildiyse, Yunanistan'ın halihazırda o denli ağır bir yük altında bulunduğu kabul edilmelidir ki savaş borcunun geri ödenmesi için ek yükler taşıyabilecek durumda değildir. Bu nedenle, Bulgaristan ve Türkiye için yapıldığı gibi, savaş borcunun tamamı silinmelidir. Yunanistan'ı İtalya ile değil de Bulgaristan ile karşılaştırsaydık da benzer sonuçlara varırdık; Yunanistan'ın Bulgaristan ile karşılaştırılması zaten daha uygun ve adil olurdu. Savaştan önce Bulgaristan dış borcunun servisi için yıllık 39,000,000 altın frank ayırıyordu. Neuilly Antlaşması uyarınca tazminat hesabına 290,000,000 sterlin ödemekle yükümlü olmasına rağmen, Müttefik Devletler 1923'te, yukarıda belirtildiği üzere (sayfa 6), bu miktarı önemli ölçüde azaltmaya karar verdiler. Öte yandan Bulgaristan, savaş öncesi borcunun servisini savaştan önce ödenen meblağın yalnızca %34'üne indirtmeyi başarmıştır. Bu göz önünde tutulursa, sonuç olarak Bulgaristan altın cinsinden borcu için fiilen yıllık 22,000,000 altın frank ödemektedir. Üstelik yıllık ödeme 1933 yılına kadar 26,000,000 altın frankı aşmayacak, ancak 1933'ten itibaren 33,500,000 altın franka yükselecektir. Bulgaristan'ın dış borcunun servisi için ayırdığı bu miktar; Yunanistan'ın halihazırda sağladığı meblağ ile yeni mülteci istikrazı hesabına ve Osmanlı Düyun-ı Umumiyesi'ndeki orantılı payı için sağlamak zorunda kalacağı miktarla karşılaştırıldığında,
İngilizce
Henüz yok.